WARNING: THIS BLOG POST CONTAINS SENSITIVE SUBJECT MATTTER
I came face to face with the dark side of computer forensics three years ago. I was involved in a child custody case of a five-year-old girl. The wife retained me to forensically examine the family computer to review her ex-husbands online activity. The first thing I noticed when I started the forensic analysis was that the wife and her ex-husband both used the computer under one user profile. This information will come into play later on in this story.
I explained to the wife that because all of the activity falls under one user, it would be very difficult (if not, impossible) to determine who was seated at the computer and was physically online. The wife told me that this was not going to be difficult since she was very sick with cancer and was undergoing tests and treatments out of state for several weeks during the specific dates and times that I was to analyze.
As soon as I started reviewing the internet history I found several Google searches for “incest” and “father/daughter sex” websites. I relayed this information to the wife along with the dates and times the searches were conducted, and she determined that this was when she was out of state for treatment. After finding these searches, I then started looking at the images/videos contained on the hard drive. It was when I conducted a search for deleted images/videos that I found an indecent picture of an underage girl. Because the image was deleted and found in the unallocated area of the hard drive, the dates and times the picture was viewed were removed.
Our company policy relating to indecent images of underage children is to cease the examination and contact law enforcement whenever one picture/video is found during analysis. With that being said, I immediately contacted law enforcement and turned the case over to them. I stayed in contact with the wife and acted as a liaison between her and the law enforcement officers handling the case.
I was called to testify in State court a couple of months later. The defense attorney turned his attention to the fact that even though there were indecent pictures of underage children on the hard drive, it was impossible to say for sure it came from his client. I had to agree to that statement, as I was not able to conduct a thorough investigation due to the fact that I turned the data over to law enforcement early on in the forensic analysis. At the time of my testimony, law enforcement was still analyzing the hard drive, so they were not able to provide further information on the origin or dates and times of the indecent images.
After two days of the hearing, the judge awarded unsupervised custody to both parents. I remember talking with the wife and her family after the hearing and heard their fear about what the ex-husband will do to his daughter when she is alone with him. We tried desperately to get the law enforcement officers to expedite their investigation, but they had a backlog of cases that they deemed more important.
The last time I spoke to the wife (a couple of months ago), they were in the process of appealing the custody decision and the ex-husband still had joint custody of the daughter.